THE COMING CRACKDOWN ON BLOGGING
By Michelle Malkin
CNET reporter Declan McCullagh has an important piece warning of the "coming crackdown on blogging."
Joshua Claybourn of In the Agora analyzes the campaign finance law absurdities and First Amendment infringements on bloggers here.
Winfield Myers is on the same wavelength. He writes:
The possibilities that [FEC commissioner Bradley] Smith lays out are chilling and, if enacted, could spell the end of blogging as we know it. Indeed, it could turn much of what is published on the Net into a samizdat-style activity.
Sound alarmist? Read on. It all stems, of course, from McCain-Feingold, the absurd and (pace the Supreme Court) unconstitutional curtailment of political speech in violation of the First Amendment. Both Senators, and the Democratic members of the Commission, favor regulating political speech on the Internet, lest bloggers and electronic publications enjoy an advantage over print publications. This is a huge power grab by elements of the federal bureaucracy who are threatened by New Media, and a first step by those forces to shut down political speech they don't like.
This is something bloggers of all political stripes should unite against. Instapundit has more links.
I think McCullagh and FEC commissioner Brad Smith have done a real service sounding the alarm as the panel moves forward on extending McCain-Feingold to the Internet. Here's the last paragraph from the CNET interview, but make sure to read it in its entirety:
Smith: This is an incredible thicket. If someone else doesn't take action, for instance in Congress, we're running a real possibility of serious Internet regulation. It's going to be bizarre.
Update: Lots of buzz about this:
- Steven Bainbridge: "Thank You Senators McCain and Feingold ... you [plural expletive deleted]"
- Pajama Hadin: "The Coming Crackdown on Blogging"
- Rightwing Nuthouse: "BLOGOSPHERE… WE HAVE A PROBLEM"
- Say Anything: "Political Blogging To Be Outlawed?"
- Baronger's Scribblings: "Political Prisoners coming to the United States?"
- Mike Krempasky: "FEC regulating Blogging?"
- Susanna Cornett, "Will blogging be restricted by the government?"
- Hennessy's View: "McCain-Feingold Outlaws Blogging?"
- The Anchoress, "You knew this was coming, and right on time..."
- The invaluable Captain Ed, who has long assailed the back-door First Amendment violations of the McCain-Feingold Act, writes:
Bigger blogs will come under closer scrutiny, which means that any expression of support on CQ with a referential hyperlink may well get valued at more than the $2,000 maximum hard-cash contribution.
In order for me to operate under those conditions, I will need to hire a lawyer and an accountant to guide me through the election laws and calculate my in-kind donations on almost an hourly basis. How many bloggers will put up with that kind of hassle just to speak their minds about candidates and issues?
-More round-up from Red State, including reaction from the left side of the blogosphere. MyDD, for example, writes:
I swear to the gods, how idiotic can people be? If the 3 Democratic-appointed judges on the FEC panel manage to extend the 2002 campaign finance law to regulate political speech over the internet, we Democrats can say hello to the wilderness for sure.
RS's Mike Krempasky is right about this:
Make no mistake - Democrats and Republicans together got us into this mess, including President Bush - who in the most glaring example of political cowardice of his administration signed McCain-Feingold.
But now that it's becoming clear what sort of disaster we're heading for as this law evolves and expands - the Democrats own this one. The Republican members of the FEC have seen the edge of the cliff and are trying to back away, only to be frustrated by the three Democratic appointees on the Commission. So I hope that our friends on the left side of the blogosphere will join us in urging those Democrats to stop this before it's too late.
Consider it the first opportunity for the left-of-center bloggers to have their very own Sister Souljah moment.
Here's hoping. In the meantime, here's contact info for the FEC:
Federal Election Commission, 999 E Street, NW, Washington, DC 20463 (800) 424-9530
The commissioners' pages are here.
Brad Smith's home page quotation is particularly fitting as this battle of the Blogs Vs. Big Government looms:
“I want to note that the growth of regulation generally, or more precisely, the growth of the administrative state, is itself smothering democracy in America, not only in its particulars, but in its general, ubiquitous presence.”
--Bradley A. Smith, speech delivered at the Catholic University Law Review’s Election Law Symposium on September 23, 2000.
Just so no one forgets, here's how each member of the Senate voted on McCain-Feingold back in '01. And here's how members of the House voted on the House companion bill known as Shays-Meehan.
Update II: Letters, we've got letters. There's Captain Ed's letter to Senators. And Mark Coffey's open letter to Sen. McCain.
Via the Anchoress, here's contact info for the entire Congress. Thursday, March 3, 2005
www.michellemalkin.com
*
BALI BOMBING MASTERMIND GETS 30 MONTHS FOR THE MURDER OF 202 PEOPLE
The leniency of Bali bombing mastermind Abu Bakar Bashir's sentence -- 30 months for the murder of 202 people -- has shocked the Australian public, not in the least because after long labor the mountain has brought forth a mouse.
Former magistrate Brian Deegan, who lost his son Josh, 22, in the Bail bombing, said Bashir's sentence was outrageous. "It equates to a bit over a week (in jail) per man, woman and child that were hurt," Mr Deegan said today. "You get no closure out of this, it's absolutely insulting."
Australian Federal Police commissioner Mick Keelty is warning that the kid-glove treatment of Bashir has not satisified his supporters, who regard the slightest inconvenience to their 'spiritual leader' for the mere act of murdering infidels a mortal insult.
New terrorist attacks are possible in a backlash by supporters of Indonesian Muslim cleric Abu Bakar Bashir over his jailing, Australia's senior police officer said here Friday. Australian Federal Police commissioner Mick Keelty said intelligence agencies would be updating terror threat assessments, taking into account a possible violent response from Bashir's supporters.
Veteran newsman Max Soliven of the Philippine Star who has covered Indonesia since the Sukarno era in the mid-1960s talks about the shadow of fear that is spreading where it had never been seen before.
"This sends the message to us, who live fearfully on the perimeter of the JI venom this vicious agitator has been sowing among the pesantren, the thousands of religious schools (equivalent to our Muslim madrasas here) ... the government prosecutors acted like a bunch of nervous Nellies at the trial .... many witnesses refused to testify ... Only one witness, Nasir Abbas, has linked Bashir to terrorism, resolutely testifying that the cleric had personally pit him (Abbas) in charge of "terrorist activities in part of the Philippines".
Indonesia’s turmoil had never been about religion. ... Indonesia was a society in which women played a major role, free from the fetters of second-class status ... In my recent visits, I’ve seen – while some of the smiles remain spontaneous – a visible change. An increasing number of women are wearing head scarves, and even all-black covering (ala the Middle East’s structures). Christian churches are being bombed, Christian communities embroiled in civil war with their once-friendly and happy Muslim neighbors, with the ABRI (Armed Forces) too often siding with the militant Islamic jihadis.
Salamabit*, you don’t even have to go to Indonesia. A Vice-Governor of the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao ... is now insisting on implementing a city ordinance ... which requires every Muslim female in Marawi City, yep in our own Mindanao, to wear the head-scarve, otherwise be penalized with a fine of thousands of pesos ... (* Sonuvabitch)
Solivan notes what most of the regular newspapers have missed: that Bashir was at the nexus of the Saudi madrassa system that is the assembly line of terrorism. It is the same system that produced Ahmed Omar Abu Ali, a "former Virginia high school valedictorian ... accused in federal court Tuesday of allegedly conspiring with al-Qaida to assassinate President Bush." And it is a system that has proved too powerful to shut down or even criticize.
Lawyers for Abu Ali, who graduated at the top of his class from the Islamic Saudi Academy in Alexandria, said he would plead not guilty. Raised in nearby Falls Church, Va., he was enrolled at a university in Medina when he was arrested. ... According to the grand jury indictment, items found at Abu Ali's home in Falls Church a week after his arrest included a six-page document on how to avoid government and private surveillance, a document praising the Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar and the terror attacks on New York and the Pentagon, a copy of Handguns magazine with the name "Ahmed Ali" on the subscription label, audio tapes promoting violent holy war and the killing of Jews, and a book by Al Qaeda deputy Ayman Al Zawahiri criticizing democracy.
Presiding judge O'Grady issued the ritual apology which has become a standard part of treating with these men of the shadows. "I can assure you, you will not suffer any torture or humiliation while in the marshals' custody". Already the victims have become accustomed to craving pardon, in advance, for their unspeakable inferiority, before the emissaries of the madrassas. If US judges are halfway to their knees how likely is it that the Indonesians will hold themselves erect? Secretary Donald Rumsfeld provided the broadest description of the nature of the conflict and laid out what it took to defeat the enemy:
this struggle cannot be won by military means alone ... And since, ultimately, what they need to survive is the support of those who they can indoctrinate, this is an ideological battle as well. ... This war has required not only the vigorous pursuit of known terrorists, but finding ways to stop extremists from gaining recruits and adherents. It is this ideological component, I suggest, that is the essential ingredient for victory.
And it is in this essential area that Australia and by extension the United States, have lost a serious battle. Unless the foundations of the enemy's power are shaken there can be no victory against ever-growing tide that will come against us.
"For into the midst of all these policies comes the Ring of Power, the foundation of Barad-dur, and the hope of Sauron. Concerning this thing, my lords, you now all know enough for the understanding of our plight, and of Sauron's. If he regains it, your valour is vain, and his victory will be swift or complete: so complete that none can foresee the end of it while this world lasts. If it is destroyed, then he will fall: and his fall will be so low that none can foresee his arising ever again. For he will lose the best part of his strength that was native to him in his beginning, and all that was made or begun with that power will crumble, and he will be maimed for ever, becoming a mere spirit of malice that gnaws itself in the shadows, but cannot again grow or take shape. And so a great evil of this world will be removed. Other evils there are that may come; for Sauron is himself but a servant or emissary." JRR Tolkien Thursday, March 3, 2005
http://belmontclub.blogspot.com
*
BASHIR GETS AWAY WITH MORE MURDER
An Indonesian court has absolved Islamic extremist cleric Abu Bakar Bashir of guilt for the 2003 Marriott Hotel mass murder: Hotel Bomb Charges Against Bashir Not Proven-Court. (Hat tip: Midas.)
JAKARTA (Reuters) - An Indonesian court said on Thursday prosecutors had failed to prove Muslim cleric Abu Bakar Bashir was involved in the 2003 J.W. Marriott Hotel bombing.
“The defendant must be freed from the first case (Marriott bombing) because the charges cannot be proven,” a member of the five-judge panel read in a statement on the court’s behalf.
Judges have not yet read their final verdict, expected later in the day. Wednesday, March 2, 2005
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog
*
BYRD'S INCOHERENT DEFENSE
Senator Robert Byrd's office issued a defense of his remarks comparing Republican attempts to bar filibusters on judicial nominations with Naziism in the Senate earlier this week. Unfortunately, it appears that Byrd's staff suffers from the same incoherence that afflicts their boss most of the time:
Sen. Robert Byrd's description of Adolf Hitler's rise to power was meant as a warning to heed the past and not as a comparison to Republicans, a spokesman for the West Virginia Democrat says. ...
"Terrible chapters of history ought never be repeated," said Tom Gavin, spokesman for Byrd. "All one needs to do is to look at history to see how dangerous it is to curb the rights of the minority."
Put aside all of the historical inaccuracies that one has to swallow for that argument to work, such as the fact that the Enabling Law basically abdicated the Reichstag and made Hitler a dictator, and that the Brown Shirts had driven most of Hitler's political opponents out of the Reichstag by that time anyway. If we are to take Byrd's comments at face value, how can we not come to the conclusion that he sees the GOP as a malevolent threat on the order of Hitler? After all, if Republicans simply represent legitimate political opposition in Byrd's mind, then he would argue against their position based on the merits of the case. That's not what Byrd did. He deliberately and repeatedly mentioned Hitler and the Nazis to imply that as the end result we would face if the Republicans limited debate on judicial nominations.
If he had meant to say that taking away the filibuster would lead to the tyranny of the majority, then all Byrd would have to use would be the lower chamber of Congress as an example, and not the Nazis. That has really been the issue with a few traditionalists in the Senate; they don't want to be a senior House and like their ability to extend debate. However, for Byrd to argue that, he would have to defend his record for changing the cloture rule four times to suit his own purposes during his tenure as Majority Leader two decades ago.
No, Byrd meant to smear the GOP as a second coming of the goose-stepping Nazis, but perhaps he thought that the speech would garner notice only from the DC inside circles and the Democrats' MoveOn base, which didn't exactly shy away from making the same comparison all during the presidential election (or even afterward, as Janeane Garofalo proved after the State of the Union speech). His mistake was getting caught -- and his office's mistake will be in resisting an apology for it.
Byrd occupies no leadership positions in the Democratic Senate, but his seat comes up for election next year. All indications are that Byrd intends on running for re-election. Perhaps this episode will finally convince West Virginians to retire this doddering old fool. Thursday, March 3, 2005
www.captainsquartersblog.com
*
THE LEFT'S VERSION OF "HATE SPEECH"
While Byrd blithely compares America to Nazi Germany and gets a pass from his party, over at Daily “Screw Them” Kos the Kidz are whining about Republican “hate speech” (you’re going to laugh when you see what they’re calling “hate speech”) and clamoring for Republican Congressman Jim Gibbons’ resignation. (Hat tip: Geoffrey.)
Jim Gibbons, an extremist Republican Congressman from Nevada, offers the latest version of the GOP “dissent is treason” talking points, coupled with the threat of violence against political opponents:
“I say we tell those liberal, tree-hugging, Birkenstock-wearing, hippie, tie-dyed liberals to go make their movies and their music and whine somewhere else,” Gibbons said to another burst of applause. ...
He said that they are the same people who wanted to go to Iraq and become human shields for the enemy.
“I say it’s just too damn bad we didn’t buy them a ticket,” Gibbons said.
Laughter rippled through the room, mingled with more applause. (Emphasis added.)
This kind of hate speech has no place in civil society. By engaging in such base commentary, Rep. Gibbons has declared himself unfit to hold office and must resign.
LA TIMES SHILLS FOR NORTH KOREA
You’re not going to believe this one; the Los Angeles Times has now become a shill for the murderous communist regime of North Korea: N. Korea, Without the Rancor.
TOTALITARIAN REGIMES ARREST BLOGGERS
The Committee to Protect Bloggers points out that in the last week, totalitarian regimes have been arresting and threatening numerous bloggers:
Malaysian blogger Jeff Ooi questioned by police.
Bahraini blogger Ali Abdulemam arrested with two of his fellow moderators on the BahrainOnline bulletin board.
Iranian blogger Nasjeh Omidparvar arrested.
Omidparvar, who is pregnant, is the wife of recently convicted blogger Mohamad Reza Nasab Abholahi.
This is the down side of the recent media focus on blogging; the repressive theocrats and dictators of the world also read our media. They perceive a threat to their control of information, and they’re reacting the way these atavistic monsters always do—by attempting to crush the threat at its source.
But this time, they’re going to fail. Thursday, March 3, 2005
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog
*
GI-BRACELET.ORG
Here is a recently launched fund raising effort to help the families and the children of the injured or fallen soldiers.
What is great and unique with the concept is that:
1. 100% of the purchase price (not just 100% of proceed) goes towards a non-profit charity fund of the choice of the donor.
2. The site provides real time stats on how much money is raised.
3. The site has open transparent accounting. All purchases are posted on the Web site, and the whole world gets to see where the money raised goes to. This ensures integrity and legitimacy.
*
DEMOCRAT CAMPAIGN FINANCE SHENANIGANS
By Michelle Malkin
From the Seattle Times:
The Washington Democratic Party may face thousands of dollars in fines for failing to file timely reports for the 2004 election. In addition to those fines, the party could be required to repay a $100,000 fine that was suspended in 2003 as long as the Democrats didn't have any serious campaign-finance infractions during the next five years.
In a letter to the state Public Disclosure Commission (PDC), state Democratic Party Chairman Paul Berendt admitted mistakes were made by party staff members. Late last summer, he said, the party transferred $394,000 from a federal account to a state account, but individual donor-contribution data were not disclosed, in violation of state rules.
The commission said that in October, a form was electronically filed by the Democrats for the state account, indicating the deposit of $394,000, but no individual contributors were disclosed in the report. The individual contributors weren't disclosed until Jan. 24, 104 days late.
The commission will investigate the latest complaint and, if the party is found in violation, the reimposition of the $100,000 fine will be automatic, PDC spokesman Doug Ellis said. He said the violations are so serious they will be referred to the Attorney General's Office for possible prosecution. The party could face fines of $10,000 for each violation.
In 2003, the Washington State Democrats were slapped with the largest campaign-disclosure fine imposed against a political party in state history after failing to properly disclose about $7 million worth of campaign donations and expenditures during the 2000 election.
No word from Washington Democrat Sen. Patty Murray or Sen. Maria Cantwell, longtime self-avowed advocates of "campaign finance reform," on the state Democrat party's habitual disregard for public disclosure. Thursday, March 3, 2005
WILL FEMINISTS APPLAUD?
By Michelle Malkin
From Kabul:
AFGHANISTAN today named its first female provincial governor, a step forward in the slow political progress of women since the fall of the Taliban more than three years ago.
The appointment of Habiba Sorabi as the new governor of Bamiyan was announced in a brief statement on state-run Kabul Television.
Ms Sorabi, who was picked from an all-female short list, served as women's affairs minister in the previous interim administration of President Hamid Karzai, which approved a constitution enshrining of equal rights for women last year.
Conditions for women in Afghanistan have gradually improved since the overthrow in late 2001 of the Taliban regime, which barred women from education and from venturing out of doors unveiled. Wednesday, March 2, 2005
www.michellemalkin.com
*
CEASE FIRE, PALESTINIAN STYLE
Oh, it’s a cease fire, all right ... if you’re willing to overlook a few stabbings, shootings, suicide bombings, and car bombs: Car Bombing Near Israeli Troops at West Bank Shrine.
NABLUS, West Bank (Reuters) - Palestinian militants blew up a car bomb near Israeli soldiers guarding Jewish worshippers at a flashpoint shrine in the West Bank on Thursday, dealing another blow to a frayed ceasefire.
The bombing outside Joseph’s Tomb in Nablus, which caused no Israeli casualties but wounded a Palestinian mother and her four children, came two days after world leaders at a London meeting urged more forceful Palestinian action against armed groups.
GERMAN MUSLIMS ENDORSE "HAMBURG DECLARATION"
German Muslim organizations are uniting under one “umbrella group” to “combat racist practices” (who knew Islam was a race?) and make sure that German schools teach Islam without governmental supervision: German Muslims to Unite Under Umbrella Group. (Hat tip: NC.)
BERLIN, March 3, 2005 (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies) — Six major Muslim organizations in Germany have agreed to unite under one umbrella in an effort to combat racist practices against the Muslim minority in the country and ensure the teaching of Islam in schools.
During a meeting last weekend in Hamburg, the groups endorsed a document—the Hamburg Declaration—on the establishment of an Islamic body representing all German Muslims.
It stipulate the formation of working groups to outline recommendations on the establishment of the umbrella body within a year. The declaration also calls for reviewing the best means to enhance Muslim integration into German society.
There are some 3.4 million Muslims in Germany, including 220,000 in Berlin alone. Islam comes third after Protestant and Catholic Christianity.
Participants also pressed for teaching Islamic subjects in the German schools, reported Agence France Presse (AFP).
“It is vital to resolve this problem and ensure that Islam can be taught in German in schools,” said Nadeem Elyas, president of the central council of Muslims.
“If we don’t, the next generation of Muslims will grow up without values, and if they don’t get their religious education in schools they risk being influenced by bad interpretations of the Koran,” he warned.
Last week, Islamic groups won a legal verdict from the Leipzig court to supervise classes of religious education in the German schools. Such a court ruling would allow the Islamic institutions in the country to have a complete supervision on classes of Islamic subjects in schools without any government intervention.
There are 700,000 Muslim students in state schools, according to recent official estimates. Muslim institutions, however, put the number at 1,000,000.
I’d love to know what else is in that “Hamburg Declaration.” The only mention I could find is in the above story from Wahhabist propaganda organ Islam Online.
THE CASE OF BABAR AHMAD
The US is trying to have British Al Qaeda suspect Babar Ahmad extradited to face charges in Connecticut, but Ahmad’s lawyers are arguing that if he goes before a US military tribunal it would be a denial of his right to a fair trial. Today the US won some more time: U.S. Wins Adjournment in Extradition Case.
Ahmad was indicted in Connecticut in October on charges of supporting terrorism, conspiring to kill Americans and laundering money. U.S. authorities are seeking to have him extradited to stand trial in the United States.
Ahmad is accused of running several Web sites, including Azzam.com, which investigators say was used to recruit al-Qaida, Taliban and Chechen rebel fighters and to outfit them with gas masks, night-vision goggles and camouflage gear.
In an interview with The Associated Press on Wednesday, Hardy alleged that Ahmad had tried to set up a terrorist training camp in Arizona, where he met with Islamic radicals who claimed ties to Osama bin Laden.
Hardy said Ahmad met in Phoenix in 1998 with Yaser Al Jhani, a member of the Islamic mujahedeen militia, and others who claimed to have access to bin Laden. “He expressed an interest in developing a training system in Arizona,” Hardy said. “That is, a training system, in effect for the mujahedeen to visit and train to fight abroad.” He said there was no evidence the camp had ever been established.
British Muslims, however, think Mr. Ahmad has done nothing wrong:
Outside the court, Bilal Patel, spokesman for the Ahmad family, was supported by more than 50 protesters waving banners “Bush terrorist number one” and “Free Babar Ahmad.”
“I think these proceedings are a complete farce,” said Patel. “Why should he be sent to America if he can be charged and tried in the UK?”
Ahmad’s father Ashfaq said his son was not guilty.
“What they said about him is all lies and he has done absolutely nothing. He is not at all a terrorist and I am quite confident he will be a free man.”
A supporter of British-born terror suspect Babar Ahmad, who is facing extradition to the U.S., takes part in a protest outside Bow Street Magistrates Court in London, March 2, 2005. Britain began extradition hearings on Wednesday for Ahmad who is wanted in the U.S. for running terrorist Web sites, but Muslim groups said he should be tried at home. Photo by Toby Melville/Reuters Thursday, March 3, 2005
SCHOOLGIRL WINS RIGHT TO HIDE
Another incremental victory for Dark Ages misogyny in Britain: Schoolgirl wins right to wear Muslim gown. (Thanks to all who emailed.)
A schoolgirl who was refused permission to wear an Islamic gown in class claimed a “victory for all Muslims” yesterday after the Court of Appeal ruled that she had been denied the right to manifest her religion.
Shabina Begum, 16, decided when she turned 14 to wear a jilbab, a full-length dress that conceals the shape of a woman’s arms and legs. She said the decision of Denbigh High School, in Luton, to insist that she wore uniform was the consequence of an atmosphere in which Islam had been made “a target for vilification in the name of the war on terror”.
Almost 80 per cent of the 1,000 pupils at the over-subscribed comprehensive are Muslim and the head teacher was born into a Bengali Muslim family. Girls are permitted to wear the shalwar kameez, a sleeveless, smock-like dress worn over tapered trousers, and an approved headscarf.
Although that was seen by the school as satisfying the religious obligation that Muslim girls should wear modest clothing, Miss Begum believed that Islamic law required women over the age of 13 to cover their bodies completely, apart from the face and hands. The school refused to allow the jilbab in September 2002 and she lost almost two years’ education.
Last September she was accepted by another local school that allows her to wear the jilbab and she is now studying for her GCSEs. Wednesday, March 2, 2005
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog
*

http://news.bostonherald.com/holbert
*
SAUDIS GET DIRECT WITH ASSAD
Bashar Assad must feel as though he's auditioning for a remake of The Lonely Guy this week, as his international political support has crumbled in a flash. The Egyptians earlier today alluded to Saudi expectations for a Syrian withdrawal from Lebanon, and now the Saudis have spoken for themselves (via Instapundit):
Saudi officials told Syrian President Bashar Assad on Thursday that he must fully withdraw troops from Lebanon and begin soon or face strains in Saudi-Syrian ties. Assad promised only to study the idea of a partial withdrawal by later this month.
The kingdom took a tough line as Assad met with the Saudi leader, Crown Prince Abdullah, and other officials in Riyadh. So far, Damascus has resisted Arab pressure for a quick pullout from Lebanon.
Saudi officials told Assad the kingdom insists on the full withdrawal of all Syrian military and intelligence forces from Lebanon and wants it to start "soon," according to a Saudi official who spoke by telephone from Riyadh.
The Saudis probably never had much love for the Assad regimes anyway, as their socialist and mainly secular military dictatorship doesn't appeal to the traditional notion of Islamic monarchy favored by the House of Saud. Nonetheless, this demand has not been heard in the past from Riyadh, and the Saudis have never been all that keen on supporting native democratic reforms, for good reason; successes -- as we see now -- tend to provide momentum in other countries for the same purposes.
The Saudis don't want to see a native Syrian popular revolt for democratization, as having one in Iraq provides enough destabilization for their taste. They want Assad out of Lebanon in order to localize the phenomenon to Lebanon and keep it far away from Saudi Arabian borders. They also want Assad's meddling and his sponsorship of terrorism to stop providing the West a casus belli.
It hardly matters to Assad, though, what the Saudis want. Their blunt demand to retreat from Syria only piles the pressure on Damascus, and if enough of it builds up, Assad may have to flee for his life as Syrian power brokers rethink their support for his regime.
ARABS TELL SYRIA TO GET OUT OF LEBANON
In another signal that exasperation with the Assad regime may run closer to Damascus than Assad would prefer, members of the Arab League have joined the chorus telling Syria to get out of Lebanon at the earliest possible moment:
Arab leaders launched a flurry of diplomatic activity Thursday, including a trip by Syrian President Bashar Assad to Saudi Arabia, as they sought to control a political storm over Syria's role in neighboring Lebanon. ...
Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit said Wednesday night after meeting with his Saudi counterpart, Prince Saud al-Faisal, that they had discussed how to "find a mechanism to implement" last year's U.N. Security Council resolution that called for all foreign forces to leave Lebanon.
"Egypt is encouraging Syria to settle the situation surrounding Lebanon as soon possible," Aboul Gheit said.
The League does not plan on putting the Cedar Revolution on its foreign-miniter agenda for this conference, and neither Syria's nor Lebanon's foreign ministers have been invited to attend. Still, having Eqypt and Saudi Arabia (indirectly) tell Assad that his time has run out has to come as a shock, and not just to Assad. Hosni Mubarak last week suddenly committed Egypt to multiparty elections for the first time in decades, a move that has received plenty of skepticism. This statement on behalf of the pro-democracy activists indicate Mubarak might be serious about leaving a legacy of freedom in the Middle East. Having Saudi Arabia join Egypt in demanding a withdrawal from Lebanon, even indirectly, is worse for Assad: even committed dictatorships don't support his expansionism any longer.
The calls from two Arab nations opposing Assad's policies amount to an amazing vote of no-confidence in the former optometrist, who may have some problems seeing the writing on the wall. His political opponents in Damascus, and perhaps even some of his followers, may have clearer political vision. If Assad can't get in front of this wave of democratization and liberalization in Southwest Asia to take ownership of it, as Mubarak obviously intends to do, then Assad's days are numbered -- and in Syria, that could well be literally.
RUSSIA TELLS SYRIA TO LEAVE LEBANON
Bashar Assad's hope of holding onto some international political cover for his continued operation in Lebanon took a body blow this morning, as his normally reliable trading partner Russia told him that Syria should leave Lebanon as soon as possible:
Russia has increased the pressure on its ally Syria by joining calls for Damascus to withdraw its troops from Lebanon.
Sergei Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister, said: "Syria should withdraw from Lebanon, but we all have to make sure that this withdrawal does not violate the very fragile balance which we still have in Lebanon, which is a very difficult country ethnically."
America, supported by France, has led international pressure on Syria, particularly through a UN resolution demanding the removal of foreign forces from Lebanon.
Russia has, of late, been somewhat of an apologist for the Syrians, openly questioning the identification of Damascus as a center for terrorists and of Syrian involvement in Palestinian and Iraqi attacks. One would imagine that the sudden discovery last week of 30 ex-Saddam functionaries operating a support network for the carbombing lunatics in Baghdad, including Saddam's half-brother, might have disabused Russia of its inclination to give Assad the benefit of the doubt. Still, Russia plans on selling anti-aircraft missiles to Assad despite concerns about their use by terrorists to attack civilian as well as military planes.
Perhaps this is one reason that George Bush has actively sought to focus on the Syrians, which he had begun to do even before Assad or his intelligence services made the terrible decision to assassinate Rafik Hariri and touch off a nationalist Lebanese freedom movement. His European tour did not do much to convince Putin to stop selling arms to Syria (or nuclear technology to Iran, for that matter). Bush may have instead decided to focus on the customer end of that transaction, trusting that the Iraqi elections would wake Syrians from their torpor and start a demand for democratization. Little did he know that Assad would do Bush's work for him, and in a stunningly effective manner.
Surprisingly then, Russia has joined the international chorus pushing for Syrian withdrawal, even though it threatens to destabilize the Assad regime. Putin may have feared diplomatic isolation on this point, as France has partnered with the US for the first time in ages on a point of international politics, and Germany's Gerhardt Schroeder has also publicly demanded a Syrian withdrawal. With Europe and the US tightly united on Syria, Putin may have decided that backing Assad has become a losing bet. Thursday, March 3, 2005
www.captainsquartersblog.com
*
CONSENSUS JUSTICE

Investor's Business Daily editorialized today under the title "Referendum Justice".
Beneath the dust kicked up is the ugly fact that the ruling in Roper vs. Simmons wasn't based on the Constitution. Writing for the majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy cited not America's founding document and guiding law, but "national consensus" and "international opinion."
How is it that a majority of our Supreme Court justices, all with presumably first-rate intellects, can have such a fundamental misunderstanding of their duty?
That duty was made clear in Marbury vs. Madison more than 200 years ago, when Chief Justice John Marshall concluded that the court must rule on the constitutionality of legislated law.
In 2005, however, Kennedy, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and John Paul Stevens use "national consensus" and "international opinion" to interpret what the Eighth Amendment means when it says "cruel and unusual punishments" are not to be inflicted. ...
Justices must decide what the framers meant by "cruel and unusual." Reading today's mood using the "evolving standards of decency" test cited by the Missouri court that initially ruled against executing juvenile offenders is like putting a finger to the wind. If they and the "living document" faction don't like what they read in the Constitution, they have to change it through the process provided. Thursday, March 3, 2005
www.coxandforkum.com