Home  |   Jihad Watch  |   Horowitz  |   Archive  |   Columnists  |     DHFC  |  Store  |   Contact  |   Links  |   Search Friday, October 24, 2014
FrontPageMag Article
Write Comment View Comments Printable Article Email Article
Font:
Economic Life, or "Stimulus" Death? By: Donald Lambro
Washington Times | Monday, June 08, 2009


Something quite hopeful has been happening to the economy, but it's not getting the credit it deserves and little notice from the national news media in terms of its policy implications.

The American economy appears to be showing signs life in some of its key sectors amid widely shared economic forecasts that the recession will end in the third or fourth quarter of this year and the economy will start growing again.

All recessions end - often long before the doom-and-gloomers say they will - but this one is showing modest signs of improvement even though only a relatively small portion of the Obama administration's massive $800 billion economic stimulus fund has been spent.

The Commerce Department reported last week that factory orders rose in April by just 0.7 percent, the second gain in the last three months. OK, it was below the 0.9 percent forecasts, but significant nonetheless because it indicated some possible life in manufacturing.

Elsewhere, construction spending rose a bit for a second straight month in April by 0.8 percent; existing home sales were up three months in a row, including a sharp 6.7 percent rise in April; and banks were finding it easier to raise capital while deposits were up.

The automotive industry was in shambles, at least at General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC, which were in bankruptcy proceedings. But Ford Motor Co., which has not taken any of the government's bailout money, said last week it would boost production by 10 percent in the third quarter.

Consumer spending, which accounts for two-thirds of our economy, remains at best flat, but its contraction has slowed. It was down by 0.1 percent in April, less than the 0.2 percent forecast - a hopeful sign.

The stock market, which bases its investment decisions on what the future holds, has been experiencing a welcome "bear rally" in the past month - boosting worker 401(k)s and other pensions funds. The only question on Wall Street now is when will this turn into a bull market?

All this has happened when relatively little of the economic stimulus has gotten into the economy's bloodstream. It was fashioned to pump hundreds of billions into public-works projects, but the White House Web site showed the Transportation Department has spent only $69 million at last count as part of its pivotal infrastructure spending.

The big secret about the stimulus program is that much of the $112 billion spent or obligated thus far has gone to pay for Medicaid bills, unemployment benefits and other safety net programs and state budgetary assistance.

The Congressional Budget Office and the Government Accountability Office have long forecast that only a minority of the stimulus plan's funds would be spent by the close of this fiscal year. The lion's share will not get into the pipeline until 2010, and even that will not be entirely spent by year's end.

The recession will undoubtedly be over next year, but hundreds of billions of dollars will still be pumped into the economy for a broad swath of social programs and domestic initiatives that will produce few, if any, jobs in the short term.

"Very little of the provisions in the bill had anything to do with short-term economic growth. This was a wish list of liberal priorities dressed up as a stimulus bill," said Brian Riedl, the Heritage Foundation's chief budget analyst.

The bottom line test for Mr. Obama's big spending stimulus is: Will it create the 3.5 million to 4 million jobs that he and White House advisers say it will? So far, their numbers look like a gross exaggeration, and they seem to be back-pedaling on it.

Jared Bernstein, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr.'s economic adviser, said on ABCNews.com's "Top Line" last week that "positive GDP [gross domestic product] growth doesn't mean lower unemployment."

Jobs are almost always a lagging indicator in every recession, and we are in for many months more of weakness in the employment market. That wasn't the case coming out of the severe two-year recession in the early 1980s, when jobs were created in the hundreds of thousands each month under President Reagan's tax-cut recovery.

But Mr. Obama's recovery is based for all intents and purposes on higher spending, not unlocking job-producing investment capital through lower tax rates. That is its critical policy flaw, which will likely mean a long period of anemic post-recession growth weighed down by massive government debt.

It is said that capitalism is a self-correcting system, and we are seeing some signs that self-correction is struggling to take place. But it is running into a thorny thicket of growth-stunting regulations, higher taxes to come, and a mountain of debt that Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said last week threatened the long-term recovery.

Mr. Bernanke's warnings need to be taken very seriously by the White House and Congress, which are facing a nearly $2 trillion budget deficit that could wreak havoc with America's economic future.

Donald Lambro, chief political correspondent of The Washington Times, is a nationally syndicated columnist.


We have implemented a new commenting system. To use it you must login/register with disqus. Registering is simple and can be done while posting this comment itself. Please contact gzenone [at] horowitzfreedomcenter.org if you have any difficulties.
blog comments powered by Disqus




Home | Blog | Horowitz | Archives | Columnists | Search | Store | Links | CSPC | Contact | Advertise with Us | Privacy Policy

Copyright©2007 FrontPageMagazine.com