The
Soviet Ambassador: The Making of the Radical Behind Perestroika
By Christopher Shulgan
MacLelland and Stewart, $34.99 (Can.)
Biographies of Soviet
politicians are not exactly the literary rage and it is good to see a talented
writer like Christopher Shulgan taking on Aleksandr Yakovlev. The former Soviet
boss is of interest on his own terms but the story here is the role of Canada
in the transformation of Yakovlev from a servile Stalinist to a reformer and
architect of perestroika.
The author drew on
papers from Yakovlev’s family, a mountain of written material. Armed with a
Canada Council grant, Shulgan mastered the material well enough to provide
brisk accounts of Yakovlev’s war service, his rise in the Communist Party, and
his time at Columbia University in New York. Soviet specialists will want to go
over this material with considerable care. The collector’s item here is
Yakovlev’s trip to Hollywood as part of a junket of Soviet journalists
organized by the American Society of Newspaper Editors.
Then 46, the bald,
overweight Communist hobnobs with the glitterati at a party hosted by Steve
McQueen and Jane Fonda in the Hollywood Hills. “Their heroes were people like
Fidel Castro and Che Guevara. Lenin held a special place in their hearts.” Jane
Fonda takes Yakovlev aside and lectures him on the dangers of American
militarism. “She criticized Yakovlev’s country for underestimating the
full danger of Washington’s yen for provocation.” (Shulgan’s emphasis)
Later, as ambassador
to Canada, Yakovlev comes to know the Doukhobors, exiled pacifist Russians
living in British Columbia, who protest by disrobing and starting fires. Most
of interest is Yakovlev’s friendship with Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Elliot
Trudeau. From the author’s lively account of Trudeau’s antics, one of the
strengths of this book, it is clear that the USSR already had a faithful
Canadian ambassador in the dashing Prime Minister.
“Was Trudeau a
communist?” Shulgan wonders. It’s an interesting question but the author
doesn’t run far with it. The subject was debated around Montreal after Prime
Minister Trudeau’s 1952 trip to the USSR, he says, but on this question the
author marshals no new archives or anything from Yakovlev’s material. On the
other hand, the author is very clear that Trudeau was “nearly alone among
leaders of the Western democracies in sympathizing with the Soviet side of the
Cold War.”
When Trudeau visited
the USSR, Stalin was still at the helm and the author’s account of Yakovlev’s
career makes it clear that Stalin was preparing new repressions against
“cosmopolitans,” code for Jews. Stalin’s murderous campaigns were already well
known through books such as The God That Failed and the reports of
Malcolm Muggeridge and others on Stalin’s planned famine in the Ukraine.
Shulgan doesn’t get to
this theme until the end of his book, where he says “Lenin, Stalin, and the
system they created are unrivaled in homicidal productivity.” That was the
system Trudeau defended, but his pro-Soviet stance is portrayed as though it
had little meaning, as if Trudeau had been a supporter of Brazil or New
Zealand. Trudeau gets every benefit of the doubt but that disappears when the
author turns to the United States.
Here the USA is
nothing more than race riots, assassinations, Vietnam, My Lai, and Watergate.
Worse, Cold Warriors (upper case his) such as Ronald Reagan run the place. The
author believes this is all a failure of American capitalism and American
democracy. It’s an echo of the argument, common in the seventies and
eighties, of moral equivalence between East and West. Partisans of this view
judge the USSR on its promises, and the USA on its worse cases. The author
shows a troubling tendency to give the Soviets the benefit of the doubt. When
in 1983 they shoot down KAL flight 007, killing 269 passengers including 63
Americans and 10 Canadians, he reserves his indignation for Reagan who “used
the incident to justify further buildup of nuclear arms.”
The unreflective
anti-Americanism is unworthy of a serious book and detracts from the account of
Yakovlev’s political journey. At end, the author says Yakovlev was not the
originator of perestroika, and Yakovlev himself said his time at
Columbia University put him onto the virtues of democracy. Long before that,
Yakovlev surely knew full well what a free election was, and how they worked.
One doubts he needed the tour of Canada to know why Canadian farmers outproduce
Soviet collective farms.
The Soviet Ambassador includes the predictable charges that the
United States has too much influence and is stealing Canadian identity. It
doesn’t follow that because the United States is influential that anybody,
least of all a prime minister of Canada, should take up the Soviet cause.
Was Trudeau a
communist? That question remains as least as interesting as Alesksandr Yakovlev,
and much closer to home. Meanwhile, The Soviet Ambassador is evidence
that that Christopher Shulgan could write a fine book on the subject if he
didn’t let USSR-USA moral symmetry and boilerplate anti-Americanism distract
him.