The announcement by
Pakistan's civilian government that it will pursue impeachment proceedings
against President Pervez Musharraf could help end months of political paralysis
in the country and stabilize the new civilian government, which has been
divided over whether Musharraf should stay in power. The fate of Musharraf now
lies largely in the hands of Chief of Army Staff General Ashfaq Kayani. The
U.S. should stay as removed as possible from the political machinations in
Pakistan while urging all sides to find a peaceful resolution to the political
crisis that strengthens the democratic institutions of the country and prevents
a return to military rule.
In order to hold the new
coalition government together, the ruling Pakistan People's Party (PPP), and
its junior coalition partner the Pakistan Muslim League/Nawaz (PML/N) decided
to pursue impeachment of President Musharraf. The PML/N had pulled its nine
ministers from the cabinet in May after the two parties failed to agree on a
formula for reinstating judges deposed by Musharraf last year. PML/N leaders
had signalled that if the two parties could not reach agreement on
reinstatement of the judges and removal of Musharraf by August, the PML/N would
withdraw its support for the government, thereby precipitating the fall of the
PPP-led administration. Now entering its fourth month, this three-way power
struggle between the PPP, PML/N, and President Musharraf has distracted the
Pakistani leadership from dealing with rising economic and terrorism
challenges.
Spiking Tensions in
U.S.-Pakistan Relationship
The current political crisis
follows Pakistani Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani's visit to Washington last
week, which was largely overshadowed by U.S. media reports that American
officials recently confronted Pakistan with information linking its
intelligence service to the July 7 bombing of the Indian embassy in Kabul.
Frustration has been growing in the U.S. over Pakistan's lack of control of its
border areas and its pursuit of peace deals that have given militants greater
latitude to operate in the region. The U.S. accusations of official Pakistani
links to the Indian embassy bombing has raised temperatures even higher,
fueling concern within Pakistan's security establishment that the U.S. is
colluding with Kabul and New Delhi to pressure Pakistan. These Pakistani
suspicions reveal a fundamental misunderstanding of U.S. priorities in the
region: promoting stable democracy in Afghanistan and denying the Taliban and
al-Qaeda a safe haven from which to launch deadly international attacks.
Islamabad must accept that regarding terrorism, a convergence of U.S. interests
with those of Kabul and New Delhi does not translate into a wider conspiracy to
undermine core Pakistani national security interests.
Despite strained ties between
India and Pakistan over the Embassy bombing, Indian Prime Minister Singh agreed
to meet with Gilani on the fringes of a South Asia regional meeting last
weekend. Following that meeting, Gilani agreed to investigate the allegations
against the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). In contrast to Gilani's efforts
to address international concerns regarding Pakistan's role in the bombing,
Musharraf appeared to take a more defiant position, viewing the allegations as
a U.S. conspiracy against Pakistan. Indeed, last week Musharraf staunchly
defended Pakistan's ISI as “the first line of defense of Pakistan” and warned
that weakening the spy agency would also weaken the country and its army.
Decision Time for
Kayani
Musharraf's fate and the
future direction of Pakistan is largely in the hands of the Chief of Army Staff
General Kiyani. Kiyani helped to ensure the February elections were successful
and appears committed to keeping the army out of politics. Given the myriad
pressures facing Pakistan, however, he may decide to support dissolution of the
new parliament and the reassertion of army control over the government. This
would be a highly unpopular move with the Pakistani public and would likely
result in potentially violent street protests.
An alternative scenario would
be for General Kiyani to prevail on Musharraf to make a graceful exit that
would allow for the installation of a new president that would be less likely
to cause friction within the system and would allow the army to remain outside
the political fray. The army's full attention should be on the real threat to
the country's future: the advance of Taliban militants along the border with
Afghanistan and in some of the settled areas of the Northwest Frontier
Province. Clashes between the Pakistani military and pro-Taliban militants in
the Swat Valley over the last week have reportedly resulted in more than one
hundred casualties. The Taliban leadership has threatened to resume bombings
throughout Pakistan if the military operation in the Swat Valley continues.
Pakistan's internal
political turmoil provides the country an opportunity to make changes within
the system that can improve Pakistan's regional relationships and remove
international doubts about Pakistan's role in the war on terrorism. Pakistan
would find support and patience from the U.S. and neighboring countries if it
chose a path of stability and prosperity for the region. Such a decision would
require a degree of introspection and examination of its traditional
perceptions of its own security interests that has so far eluded the Pakistani
security establishment. The U.S. can help Pakistan choose the right path by
demonstrating its interest in playing the role of an honest peace broker in the
region and encouraging regional confidence building measures among Pakistanis,
Afghans, and Indians, including economic cooperation and joint border security
efforts that bring the three countries together to fight their number one
common enemy—terrorism.