Home  |   Jihad Watch  |   Horowitz  |   Archive  |   Columnists  |     DHFC  |  Store  |   Contact  |   Links  |   Search Monday, May 21, 2018
FrontPageMag Article
Write Comment View Comments Printable Article Email Article
Stopping Iran By: Jamie Weinstein
North Star Writers Group | Wednesday, July 02, 2008

Twenty-seven years ago this month, the Israeli Air Force launched a surprise attack on Iraq's Osirak reactor. The mission was complex. Israel had to fly over hostile territory, Jordan and Saudi Arabia, undetected in order to reach the Iraqi reactor. Once there, they had to destroy Osirak and get out. There was good reason to believe that not all of the pilots that left Israel that day would return home.

But they did return home after destroying Saddam Hussein's nuclear program. The chance of a "second holocaust" was averted. While the Jewish state was initially universally condemned for their provocative military assault, the world community was much more thankful for their action less than a decade later when the world united to confront Saddam Hussein's aggression in the Gulf. Had Israel not acted that June day in 1981, history would have been far different. Let's just say that, at the very minimum, Kuwait would likely now be the 19th province of Iraq and Saddam Hussein a regional hegemon.

After Operation Desert Storm ended in 1991, then-Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney sent David Ivry, then Israel's ambassador to the United States, a present. The present was a satellite picture of the ruins of Osirak 10 years after Israel's daring operation. The photograph had a hand-written inscription that read: "For General David Ivry, with thanks and appreciation for the outstanding job he did on the Iraqi nuclear program in 1981 – which made our job much easier in Desert Storm." You see, Ivry was head of the Israeli Air Force in 1981. Over a decade after the U.S. and the world condemned Israel for their operation against Iraq, the U.S. Secretary of Defense thanked Israel for its mission.  

Today, there are reports that the Israeli Air Force is again intensely training for another daring military assault, this time against Iran's nuclear weapons program. The Iranian regime has said repeatedly that it seeks to destroy Israel. At least one Iranian leader has openly called for "a world without the United States." Israel is a small country. A nuclear attack against it would be the end of it as a nation. How can anyone expect Israel to tolerate a nuclear-armed state that has openly called for its destruction? And how can the United States and the West, in a post-9/11 world, tolerate a terrorist-sponsoring Islamist state with nuclear capabilities?

An operation against Iranian nuclear facilities would be much more difficult than the Osirak operation was in 1981. Iranians have reportedly hidden their key nuclear installations deep underground, making them tough to hit. Furthermore, the consequences of such an attack, whether by America or Israel, could potentially be severe. American troops in Iraq could find themselves the targets of Iranian missiles. Iranian-sponsored Hezbollah could launch devastating terrorist operations throughout the world. The Straits of Hormuz – where a significant portion of the world's oil travels through on its way to market – could be mined, causing oil prices to skyrocket far higher than they already are. A worldwide economic depression has to be considered a possibility.

But an Iranian regime with nuclear capability would be terribly frightening. Iran could use its nuclear weapons capability to "wipe Israel off the map" as its president has promised, to attack America through its Hezbollah proxies or to dominate the Middle East through nuclear blackmail. Proliferation of nuclear weapons programs throughout the Arab world to counter Iran would be another likely consequence. America, Israel and the world would surely be in peril if a religiously minded Iranian state, which seemingly seeks to bring about messianic apocalypse, becomes a nuclear power.

Unfortunately, conventional notions of deterrence don't work against an enemy that doesn't care about its own survival. According to former Iranian President Ali Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani – a man many in the West consider a moderate – the "application of an atomic bomb would not leave anything in Israel but the same thing would just produce minor damages in the Muslim world." Got that? The Iranian "moderate" is saying that Iran would be willing to take the consequences of a nuclear counter attack.

President Bush must use all the tools in his arsenal short of war now to bring the world together in order to put maximum pressure on the Iranian state. He must inform the world in an Oval Office speech that the consequences of failing to stopping Iranian development of nuclear weapons will ultimately be war – whether that war is the West launching an attack to destroy the Iranian nuclear program or Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon and launching a nuclear attack some day against the West.

The time for action is now. If we can stop Iran through stiffer sanctions, an oil embargo or covert sabotage, then we must employ these options. All the tricks that we in the West have up our sleeve (let us hope there are a few) must be employed. Otherwise, the world will be thrust into a terrible catastrophe.

Jamie Weinstein is a syndicated columnist with North Star Writers Group.

We have implemented a new commenting system. To use it you must login/register with disqus. Registering is simple and can be done while posting this comment itself. Please contact gzenone [at] horowitzfreedomcenter.org if you have any difficulties.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Home | Blog | Horowitz | Archives | Columnists | Search | Store | Links | CSPC | Contact | Advertise with Us | Privacy Policy

Copyright©2007 FrontPageMagazine.com