Aloise Buckley Heath once reminisced
that, when her brother set out to establish National Review in the mid-1950s,
“Our most deeply buried fear was that Gerald L.K.
Smith was the only other conservative in America.” Fifty years later, William
F. Buckley Jr.’s “weekly journal of opinion” (now bi-weekly) reaches more than 150,000
subscribers, including the president of the United States, and is recognized as
the intellectual fountainhead of modern conservatism.
This sea-change can largely be
attributed to the work of its founder. More than anyone else, William F.
Buckley Jr. came to embody conservatism itself. He made the term “conservative”
respectable, realigned the Republican Party (permanently, one hopes) to the
Right, and set in motion a movement that saw two of its members elected president
of the United States.
He began his efforts during the high tide of liberalism, the
triumph of which was then, like the ultimate withering of Marx’s colossal
State, considered inevitable. It already held all academia under its sway, as
Buckley noted in his first book, God and Man at Yale. The intelligentsia
believed the Great Depression – and the isolationist, nativist ravings of the
Old Right – discredited every alternative; liberalism was in full victory
march. In this struggle, Buckley wrote in NR’s first editorial, his
magazine “stands
athwart history, yelling Stop.”
[[AD]]
Then, WFB proceeded to create an intellectually respectable
conservatism. Buckley’s evident wit, patrician mannerisms, and expansive
vocabulary defied caricature. After the publishing of his first book, he
founded National Review (with Willie Schlamm) to present a regular
rebuttal to the nation’s academic and political culture, recruiting a roster
that included James Burnham, Whittaker Chambers, Ralph de Toledano, and Frank
Meyer. Clearly, neither the sharp-tongued young sophisticate nor his peers
could be dismissed ad hominem. Assembling this masthead proved easier
than holding together thinkers with such widely divergent views, a task Buckley
accomplished by focusing all parties on the overriding objective of defeating
Communism – and leavening disputes with his abundant personal charm. This
tactic would be writ large as Cold War conservatism united libertarians,
neo-conservatives, traditionalists, and social conservatives.
Thus unified, NR’s staff opened fire on prevailing
academic, literary, and political culture and mores. Buckley flatly stated that
university professors had a duty to defend the precepts of freedom, to deny
that all philosophies were equally true, or equally plausible. (Liberalism
claims to honor the intellect by pursuing every wind of doctrine, Buckley
wrote, but conservatism pays the mind its highest tribute: that it has come to
a few conclusions.) He believed the size and scope of government must be hemmed
in as a necessary prerequisite to reviving the engines of capitalism left
cooling under Eisenhower’s big government conservatism. He wrote that
totalitarianism could be rolled back, not merely contained. And he dared to
reveal that milieu of the Eastern Liberal Establishment regularly made martyrs
out of scoundrels like Alger Hiss, Owen Lattimore, and Harry Dexter White.
Later, Buckley would call for the disbarment of William Kunstler. In National
Review, and then in his syndicated newspaper column, “On the Right,” he
punctured the shibboleths of the Left with his rapier-like insights (which,
despite their polemical nature, remain some of the most eloquent prose of their
time). He also penned a full-length philosophical account of the Left’s
pathologies and the Right’s responses, Up from Liberalism, now regarded
by some as a classic. And the tide began to turn.
Throughout his controversies, Buckley showed an
even-handedness rare in the public square, responsibly parsing the actions of
his fellow conservatives. The young Buckley wrote McCarthy and His Enemies
to set the record straight on the validity of Joe McCarthy’s charges, but at
times condemned his methods. Buckley gave only a partial and sober approval to
the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC). Never an uncritical
Republican partisan, he chided Nixon’s Family Assistance Plan, Ford’s refusal
to meet with Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, and Reagan’s seemingly premature rapprochement
with the Soviets following the Polish coup. A devout Roman Catholic, he took on
the National Council of Catholic Bishops for their moral equivalency during the
Cold War. (They condemned the “arms race,” which ultimately toppled the
greatest atheistic regime in history, between missives demanding “Economic
Justice.”) He even criticized the pope. When Pope John XXIII published Mater
et Magistra, an unbalanced encyclical overly censorious of the West and far
too easy on the Communists, Buckley replied, “Mater sí, Magistra, no!”
Having created such an intellectual counterbalance, Buckley
would embark upon a half-century role as the protector of conservatism. In the
1960s, he read the Radical Right out of the movement, expelling the John Birch
Society and Ayn Rand cultists from its ranks. (With the 1972 publication of the
conspiracy-mongering None Dare Call it Treason, Buckley ran a review
entitled, “None Dare Call it Bullshit.”) [1] Later, as the “New Right”
looked to George Wallace as a political savior, Buckley exposed Wallace’s
statist views on every subject except
integration. Fifteen years ago, he confronted old friends with exacting
deliberation and prudence in his book In Search of Anti-Semitism.
His legacy, though, includes more than his writing. He tirelessly
organized the assault on the Left. He founded Young
Americans for Freedom (YAF) in his living room in 1960 to motivate
conservatives on campus. Three years later, he organized the Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ISI) to
provide a more balanced education than American college students were getting
(or have gotten since). The American Conservative Union sprang from a similar
meeting, and ACU counted Buckley as a board member until it established itself.
He was also a co-founder of the Conservative
Party of New York State. And he gave more than verbal support to their
cause.
In 1965, he famously entered the New York City mayoral
election to forestall the political ambitions of liberal Republican John
V. Lindsay. [2] Conservatives believed Lindsay, an antiwar
Republican and blue blood acolyte of Nelson Rockefeller, regarded the office as
a steppingstone to the White House. (They were right; Lindsay ran a dismal
campaign for president in 1972 as a Democrat and endorsed George McGovern.) Opposing
him as the Conservative Party candidate, Buckley fetched 341,226 votes (13.4
percent of the vote), nearly 60,000 votes more than the Liberal Party
candidate. Five years later, his
brother James would win Bobby Kennedy’s U.S. Senate seat on the
Conservative Party line. [3] Having helped elect George Pataki
governor, the CPNYS is still going strong, even while its counterpart, the
Liberal Party, lies in
ruins.
Bill Buckley also took the Right somewhere it had never been
before: television – specifically, public television, bringing a tiny degree
of much-needed balance to that medium. Beginning in 1966, “Firing Line” brought
more than 1,500 cultivated discussions of politics, philosophy, and
spirituality into the homes of millions of viewers. In addition to
the weekly program – which he hosted for 33 years, making it “the longest
running program with a single host” – he sponsored regular “Firing Line
debates,” rescuing this dying form of discourse from presidential candidates.
In these forums, as well as his television appearances, his
most appealing characteristic comes to the fore: his charm and irascible wit,
unchanging whether debating liberals or living the life of a bon vivant with
his (often very unconservative) friends. When he debated his friend
Ronald Reagan over the Panama Canal treaty, the two Irishmen's friendship shone
through.
Reagan's first question was, “Why haven't you rushed across
the room to tell me you've seen the light?”
Buckley replied, “I'm afraid that if I came any closer to
you, the force of my illumination would blind you.”
His friend, actor David Niven, also experienced Buckley's
caustic wit. When Niven asked Buckley for a blurb for his memoirs, Buckley
submitted, “Probably the best book ever written about Hollywood - William F.
Buckley Jr.” Upon publishing his first Blackford Oakes spy novel, Saving
the Queen, he asked Niven for a statement, and Niven told Buckley to write
something appropriate. When the two were skiing in Switzerland, Buckley told
the actor he had sent the following quotation to his publisher: “Probably the
best book ever written about f-cking the Queen - David Niven.” (Buckley later
revealed, “I think that was the only time I ever saw him really caught off
balance.”)
He is, however, most memorable for turning his wit on his
foes. He threw JFK hagiogarpher Arthur Schlesinger Jr. into fits.
When Schlesinger debated Buckley in 1961, he sarcastically told the crowd,
“Mr. Buckley has a facility for rhetoric which I envy and as well as a wit
which I seek clumsily to and vainly to imitate.” Buckley used this quotation on
the cover of his next book, Rumbles Left and Right, as though it were
spoken in earnest (provoking threats of a lawsuit from the unamused historian).
When he saw Schlesinger next, he told him, “Your deadline for my next cover
blurb is the first of the month.” These characteristics were on display even in
court, when he was sued by anti-Semitic clearinghouse Liberty Lobby. During the
trial, he regularly shrugged off the questions of his inquisitor, far-Left lawyer
Mark Lane. When Lane demanded Buckley reveal his CIA assignment, Buckley
responded, “None of your business.” [4] On another occasion, Buckley
replied, “I decline to answer that question; it’s too stupid.” When Lane asked,
“Have you ever referred to Jesse Jackson as an ignoramus?” Buckley commented,
“If I didn’t, I should have.” (Liberty Lobby lost; Buckley later won his countersuit.)
Buckley’s CIA stint was also the basis for a new venture in
the 1970s: espionage novels. Upon recoiling from Robert Redford’s presentation of
The Agency in 1975’s Three Days of the Condor,
Buckley did what he has always done: fought bad speech with good speech. Blackford
Oakes, a dapper Ivy League agent, scandalized some of Buckley’s puritanical
comrades with his easy vulgarity and hearty libido but won critical praise –
and a steady audience of readers. He went on to produce a string of engaging fiction,
both inside and outside the espionage genre, including a commendable
volume on the unlikely subject of Elvis Presley. His son Christopher, a
noted satirist in his own right, recalled
after his father’s passing, “One of the things he always told me is that industry
is the enemy of melancholy.” Buckley’s literary contributions have been nothing
if not prolific:
more than 35 nonfiction books, 20 novels, and more than 5,600 newspaper
columns. Buckley has been known to pound out his syndicated column in 15
minutes, and he long wrote his books during an annual one-month stay in
Switzerland. He wrote so quickly, he said, because, while he enjoyed
communicating, he did not enjoy the act of writing.
Yet his pen found its way through every conceivable subject,
including his own private Roman Catholic faith in his “autobiography of faith,”
Nearer, My God. Buckley made no pretense about his concerns with
his church. After the Second Vatican Council deprived him of his familiar
liturgy, he felt (rightly) that Roman Catholics had been cheated out of the beauty and worship
extended to their forebears for nearly two thousand
years. Despite his misgivings, he tried to give the new Mass a
chance, becoming a lector at his local parish (the largest in Connecticut). He
quit after three years and devoted himself
to the traditional Latin Mass. Nonetheless, he communed with a God who
transcends ritualism and ecclesiology to comfort and refresh every one of His
afflicted and weary children. And according to those who knew him best, it is
this faith that accounted for Buckley’s deep reserve of personal charity
towards others so evident in all he did.
That friendship was commented upon
by those who knew him: Ronald Reagan, Barry Goldwater, Henry Kissinger, David
Niven, George F. Will, Mona Charen, Garry Wills, Joan Didion, and scores of
writers, politicians, thinkers, and prognosticators on both sides of the aisle
whose lives or careers he touched (or in some cases, started).
The friendships continued even as
Buckley receded from the spotlight. He retired as NR’s
Editor-in-Chief in 1990, assuming the title Editor-at-Large, and strictly
curtailed his public speaking schedule at the turn of the millenium. In 2004, Buckley relinquished
ownership of National Review, citing “concerns about his own
mortality.” In “retirement,” he remained a dynamo of intellect and
erudition, churning out his twice-weekly column. He will have (at least) two
books published posthumously. Although the precise cause of death is unknown,
Buckley was found dead at his desk, likely working on a forthcoming book about
Ronald Reagan. (His previous work, Flying High: Remembering Barry Goldwater, is set to be released in May.)
William F. Buckley Jr. founded a magazine that stands
athwart history, yelling Stop – and history complied. He made eroding human
enslavement his life’s ambition and lived to see history vindicate faith and
freedom in the gulag’s rubble. He has pointed the way for thousands of American
writers, debaters, thinkers and opinion-molders. He invited us to share his
most deeply held beliefs.
In addition to all his literary and political
accomplishments, William F. Buckley Jr. became known for his sailing, skiing,
his mastery of the harpsichord, and the great loves of his life: his wife
Patricia, the music of Bach, and Peanut
Butter.
He was less known for his gentle sensitivity. One catches a
glimmer of this while listening to his audio recording of Right Reason,
a collection of WFB newspaper columns from the Reagan era. The final selection
is the eulogy he wrote for his mother, Aloise Steiner Buckley, in which his
voice bears a grief that is unaffected and shattering. One can nearly perceive
how he must have felt since April 15, 2007, when his beloved wife of 56 years,
Patricia, passed away. (His retreat from the public was, in part, to nurse the
woman he affectionately called “Ducky.”) One may also hear echoed in his strained voice
the grief conservatives will experience at each moment of our political lives
when confronted with the irreplaceable void his death has left us.
William Frank Buckley Jr., RIP.
A version of this article appeared in the July 5, 2004, edition of FrontPage Magazine. Its original publication garnered a kind note from William F. Buckley Jr.
ENDNOTES:
1. The paranoid Right has never forgotten his
treatment. Just six years ago, John Birch Society President John McManus wrote
a 288-page tome entitled William F. Buckley: Pied Piper for the
Establishment. In the ‘70s, Buckley was granted membership into the
Birchers’ favorite hobgoblin, the Council on Foreign Relations.
2. It was in this race that William F. Buckley uttered the line that has come to haunt him:
asked what he would do if elected, he replied, “Demand a recount.” Few remember the exchange earlier in the same press conference. When asked how many votes he could conservatively expect to win, he replied, “Conservatively speaking, one.”
3. After his election, National Review
would invariably refer to James Buckley as “the sainted junior senator from New
York.”
4. See John Judis’ William
F. Buckley Jr.: Patron Saint of the Conservatives. Buckley spent nine
months in the CIA in the 1950s and was tantalizingly vague about his duties.
His patriotic service has led to endless leftist speculation. He has since
revealed that while in Mexico, he edited The Road to Yenan, “a detailed account of Communist designs for world hegemony
by Eudocio Ravines, an influential Communist in pre-war Peru.”