In January, Church of England Bishop of Rochester Michael Nazir-Ali
ignited Islamic protests when he asserted that some areas of British cities
have become “no-go” zones for non-Muslims.
Now under police
protection after receiving death threats, Nazir-Ali refused to back down this
past Sunday in an interview with The Telegraph of Britain. The ethnically
Pakistani Nazir-Ali has also criticized the remarks earlier this month by his
superior, the Archbishop of Canterbury, who suggested Islamic law possibly should
have civil authority in Britain .
Nazir-Ali asked The
Sunday Telegraph: "Do the British people really want to lose that
rooting in the Christian faith that has given them everything they cherish -
art, literature, architecture, institutions, the monarchy, their value system,
their laws?"
After the initial
flare-up responding to his January comments, the Bishop of Rochester responded
on his website: "The purpose of my article was to point out that the
best way for welcoming and integrating newer arrivals in this country should
have been a Christian vision of hospitality and not the secular policy of
multi-culturalism which has led to such disastrous consequences."
[[AD]]
The Bishop of Rochester
speaks as a Christian, of course. But British and Western traditions of
tolerance and free speech should interest all who cherish those freedoms.
"I believe people should not be prevented from speaking out," he told
The Sunday Telegraph. "The issue had to be raised. There are
times when Christian leaders have to speak out."
Nazir-Ali’s father
was a convert from Islam to Christianity, a decision that could have resulted
in his death in Pakistan .
After himself becoming an Anglican bishop in Pakistan
at age 35, Nazir-Ali had to resettle in
Britain because of Islamist death threats.
So this bishop has few illusions about the threat posed by creeping
Islamization. Nor is he a stranger to the possibly lethal consequences of
challenging radical Islam.
"If you disagree,
that must be met by counter-arguments, not by trying to silence people,”
he explained to The Telegraph about the latest dangers his remarks have aroused.
“It was a threat not just to me, but to my family. I took it seriously,
so did the police. It gave me sleepless nights."
For many of
Britain ’s cultural and religious elites,
Britain’s
Islamic minority is merely an opportunity to burnish their multicultural credentials
and atone for the real and imagined sins of Christendom across the centuries. Just as British appeasers of 70 years ago sanctimoniously believed themselves
virtuous because of their zeal to accommodate fascism, today’s
multiculturalists are smugly blind. They want to pretend that radical
Islam will neatly fit into their dreams of a beautiful social mosaic.
They are loath to admit that multiculturalism is the hobby of Western liberals,
who can freely enjoy their hobby only thanks to Western concepts of tolerance. That
which they seek to appease in fact would ultimately smash their rainbow
kaleidoscope, if permitted the power.
"The recovery of Christian discourse in the public life of this
nation is so important,” Nazir-Ali told The Telegraph. “It's
that discourse that will allow us in a genuine way to be hospitable to those
who come here from different cultures and religions." Having
come from the Global South, the Bishop of Rochester knows that humanity is overwhelmingly
religious by nature. Europe ’s brief
flirtation with aggressive secularism will not persist. "The real
danger to Britain
today is the spiritual and moral vacuum that has occurred for the last 40 or 50
years,” the bishop warned. “When you have such a moral vacuum
something will fill it.”
Nazir-Ali prefers
Britain ’s historic religious traditions to
the traditions of his native Pakistan :
"If people are not given a fresh way of understanding what it means
to be a Christian and what it means to be a Christian-based society then
something else may well take the place of all that we're used to and that could
be Islam."
The Telegraph reported
that many Church of England clerics rallied to defend their chief prelate,
Rowan Williams, when he was criticized around the world for his voluminous
pontifications about possible civil recognition of Islamic Law. Few
senior prelates offered a similarly robust defense of Nazir-Ali, despite the death
threats against him.
"I don't court
popularity,” Nazir-Ali told The Telegraph. “If I say
something it's because I think it's important enough to say it.” But
he is perplexed by the reluctance of other British bishops to address the Islamization
of some British cities that even some British civil authorities openly acknowledge:
"I can't guess why they haven't talked on the issue. I'm not responsible
for other people's consciences." When The Telegraph asked if
Britain’s
religious officials are silent due to cowardice, the Bishop of Rochester
responded: "You'd have to ask them."
Nazir-Ali told The
Telegraph that Islamist teachings about polygamy, women’s rights and freedom
of belief would undermine British civil concepts about equality: "People
of every faith should be free within the law to follow what their spiritual
leaders direct them to, but that's very different from saying their structures
should replace that of the English legal system because there would be huge
conflicts."
The Bishop of Rochester speaks clearly when many of his fellow Church
of England clerics, presiding over empty museum-churches, prefer to obfuscate.
But having fled his native land once in the face of Islamist threats, Nazir-Ali
seems undeterred.