Home  |   Jihad Watch  |   Horowitz  |   Archive  |   Columnists  |     DHFC  |  Store  |   Contact  |   Links  |   Search Wednesday, July 18, 2018
FrontPageMag Article
Write Comment View Comments Printable Article Email Article
The Syrian-Jihadi "Highway" By: Dr. Walid Phares
FrontPageMagazine.com | Monday, June 04, 2007

A curious "debate" is growing rapidly among a number of Western-based analysts about the "impossibility" of the existence of Syrian-Jihadi Salafist links. More particularly, some analysts went to the extent of describing the existence of links between the Syrian Mukhabarat and the group "Fatah al Islam" operating in North Lebanon as "hazy." Ironically this mounting trend only helps to aid the current Syrian diplomatic and media campaign, as Damascus is deploying overdose efforts to deny "any link whatsoever" with Fatah al Islam. Assad shut down the passage points in northern Lebanon just few hours after the Jihadists began slaughtering the Lebanese soldiers. Interestingly enough Syria never closed entry check points to Lebanon since 1976, even though Tripoli's skies were burning during many battles between militias and factions. Was Assad too fast in denying his backing of Fatah Islam, as was his instant denial of his regime's role in the Hariri assassination?



Intelligence and Counter Terrorism experts are familiar with the weapon known as “intox” from the root word intoxication. It is a form of deception used by powers throughout history and developed as a special skill by the Soviet KGB during the Cold war. Later on various Jihadi networks, both Iranian and Salafists, have improved this method via the use of Khid’a (deception) and the historically rooted concept of Taqiya (dissimulation tactic). The bottom line is that regimes and organizations, Islamist and ultra nationalist-fascists (i.e. not sanctioned by domestic checks and balances) can use all deceptions possible and don’t have to be transparent. In the War on Terror, do not expect -naively- these radicals to tell you the real story. Hence do not expect the Syrian regime to declare that it is supporting “Fatah al Islam” at this point, nor expect the latter to declare that they are coordinating with Damascus as they have announced their allegiance to al Qaeda. Reading short of this complex reality would only mean that you have been the victim of “intox,” the enemy’s Khid’aa at its best.


History of the Assad Regime


To those who cannot fathom how a Baathist secular – and socialist – regime engages in alliances with Islamist forces, fights them, befriend ones and repress others, just review the very dense history of Hafez Assad between 1970 and 2000 and the short but still bloody history of his son Bashar from 2000 till 2007.


For 37 years, the Assad dynasty practiced Taqiya and Khid’aa as well as cross-ideological alliances. The regime supported the PLO between 1970 till 1976 before Assad ordered bloodshed with Arafat in 1976. Briefly claiming coordination with Right wing Christian parties in 1976-1977, it bombed them as in 1978. Then selecting Amal against the Palestinians, the regime supported its own “Palestinian” factions. Allying himself with Iran and Hizbollah in 1982, Assad wanted to contain Hezbollah in Beirut in 1986. Fighting against the Lebanese (Christian) Forces since the 1970s, the Syrians backed a faction among them (Elie Hobeika) in 1986, fought another (Samir Geagea) till 1989, claimed befriending the latter for a short while before ordering oppression of their partisans as of 1993. Assad fought the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria but funded the Islamists in Lebanon and Palestine. His regime claimed it was secular while becoming the single strategic ally of Iran’s Islamist elite.


In Lebanon after the withdrawal of his army’s bulk, Bashar kept his entire apparatus that ranges from Shia Hezbollah and Amal, some Druse factions, a few Christian warlords and a large range of pro-Sunni politicians and groupings. How can the Assad intelligence net achieve this? That is another story about Baathist sophistication. And as of Spring 2005, a main former anti-Syrian politician was added to the panoply of Syrian (and Iranian) political assets in the country: General Michel Aoun. However, perhaps the most advantageous “grabs” by the Baathist Mukhabarat were Sunni Islamists, who should have been ideologically on the other side of Assad, but who with the attraction of a “deity” – dollars and power – have accepted to line up with a Taghut (unjust ruler in Jihadi literature).


Indeed, in the early 1990s, Assad the father succeeded in recruiting Islamic (Sunni) Fundamentalists. Obviously, the prime against-nature alliance was with Hamas and Islamic Jihad, both Sunni Islamists. Once that was “accomplished,” other models were possible. Hence, the next wave of Sunni Islamists to be “recruited” by the Syrian intelligence where those based in Tripoli and Sidon in Lebanon: For example Harakat al Tawheed of Shaaban and the Gama’a al Islamiya. And once Syrian intelligence can penetrate that far in Sunni radical land, it can naturally fund those who will at some point “join” al Qaeda.


Years later, the Assad junta’s efforts paid off. While many in the realm of Western logic cannot absorb it, the fact is that Syrian intelligence has not only a strategic relationship with Islamic Fundamentalists who are fighting a same enemy, but also a control process over some groups who, while being attracted ideologically to al Qaeda, are enjoying the checks of the Assad regime: Hence, the odd situation of Fatah al Islam between their affiliation with the ideology of al Qaeda (contradictive with the Baath) and their acceptance of Syrian logistical (and binding) aid.


Jihadi Tactical History


One has also to have a solid understanding of Jihadi-Salafi tactical history. This type of movement is indeed very rigid ideologically. Its attitude towards the so-called Kuffar (infidels) is unshakeable: Jews, Christians, Hindus, Muslim Shiites and even Sunni “apostates” are ranked as enemies. But the Salafi Jihadists have often used their enemies, accepted their donations and produced all the reasons for this behavior. If Wahabi Islamists have welcomed strategic assistance from American infidels in Afghanistan in the 1980s they surely would accept weapons and money from the region’s Baathists. Western "experts" shouldn’t have an existential crisis if the Jihadists divert a little from the books they print. Yes, even the Salafi Jihadists can be “tactical.” In Tripoli’s case, not only Fatah al Islam was encouraged by the Syrian intelligence but a number of its leadership were jailed then freed by Damascus.


Stakes for Bashar’s Regime


Another component of the "unnatural" cooperation between the Syrian regime and a Jihadi (more than one) group in Lebanon is the urgency for Bashar. Hafez Assad used Islamist groups in Lebanon and in Palestine during the 1980s and the 1990s for very specific reasons: control of the game with Israel and with the opponents of the Baath in Lebanon. Bashar’s intelligence is using them for a higher stake: to protect the Syrian regime from collapse by ordering the crumbling of the Lebanese Government. It centers on the Hariri UN Court and on the implementation of UNSCR 1559. Only seasoned readers of Assad politics can see it clearly as his grand plan and motivation.


 The Syrian Game Plan


It is always beneficial for commentators and analysts to look at developments involving terrorism, from historical and geopolitical angles. When Fatah al Islam began the attacks against the Lebanese soldiers it wasn’t because of a bank robbery. The group declared its purpose last November to enflame Tripoli and set up a “northern front” against the Seniora Government.


The road to the battle of Tripoli began in April of 2005, when Bashar Assad delivered a speech in Damascus in which he declared his intention to withdraw his army from Lebanon under American, French and international pressures. A thorough reading at the time told all those connoisseurs of the Baathist regime that he was planning on pulling out the “first army” (the regular troops and tanks), but he has instructed the “second army” (Hezbollah, the pro-Syrian militias, and the terrorists implanted within Palestinian camps) to take the offensive.


From July to December 2005, a number of Cedars Revolution leaders were savagely assassinated and bombs targeted several areas. From January to June 2006, while the March 14 (anti-Syrian) politicians were lured into discussions with Hezbollah, the Syro-Iranians introduced weapons and terrorists through the Bekaa borders with Syria.


As of July, Hezbollah waged a war against Israel. As of October 2006, Nasrallah waged an urban war against the Seniora Government: A Minister was assassinated and downtown Beirut was occupied. From January 2007 till now, the Jihadi card is being used. This is the strategic context in which Fatah al Islam operates today: engaging the Lebanese Army in several spots, starting with Tripoli.


In short, the Assad regime has no doctrinal ethics as many experts believe in the West. The Syrian regime would sleep with any enemy and use all assets to reach its goal. Bashar’s war room can assassinate Lebanese politicians with the agents of the neo-Nazi SSNP, set off bombs and suppress Shiites intellectuals with Hezbollah expertise, besiege the Lebanese Church with the help of Christian feudal such as Soleiman Frangieh, disorient the Maronite masses with turncoat Michel Aoun, penetrate the Sunni community with “funded” Salafi Jihadists and thrust into the Druze clan with “paid” operatives.


As this terrorist architecture is set up in Lebanon, another span of “Assad Labyrinths” lures outside powers into the game. The Syrian regime, while ally with the Mullahcracy in Tehran, tells the Americans it could do business with them; and as Bashar instructs his operatives overseas to blast the Saudi regime, he flies over to Riyadh to assure them of his friendship. Hence, a regime that can master such diabolical engineering can easily recruit and remote control the little Fatah al Islam and place it throughout Lebanon.   


Fatah al Islam: Opportunistic Jihadi Hybrid


To understand the nature of Fatah al Islam, one has to cross several layers of distinctions: first between an “official chapter” of the Bin Laden organization and the other types, for Shaker al Absi’s group is not a chapter yet. Then one must distinguish between those jihadist entities fully independent from regimes and intelligence services and those “implicated” in some ways. Fatah al Islam is Salafi Jihadist, regards Bin Laden as an ideological leader, but happens to be on the receiving end of Assad’s payroll. In short, not all Jihadi groups are perfect. So, at the end of the day, the Nahr al Bared based Salafi terrorists are jihadi in nature and tied to Syrian intelligence per needs. They could be seen as “Opportunistic Hybrid Jihadis.” They can adapt to situation in the future, if they survive as an organized networks.


Some terrorism commentators in the West and in the US spoke of an “elusive Fatah al Islam.” Little seasoned with the Levantine nature of the phenomenon, these commentators still struggle with what they describe as “speculation” over the group’s “real motives,” as if they haven’t captured the equation behind Fatah al Islam.


These commentators base their inability to define the group on classical ethnocentric errors. First, they conclude that this group can’t have ties to Damascus because the Syrian regime executed four members of the group. Ironically, the news came from the Syrian intelligence itself, which means that the Assad regime can go as far as killing operatives to intimidate the rest of the group and, on top of it, “sell” the news to the world as an “an anti al Qaeda” activity, which by the way would be bought by US officials. It would take a world, and many books to explain the twisted, but successful mindset of the regime in Damascus. “Killing” Islamists at the hand of the Syrian soldiers is another form of taming wild activities. And for those who can’t fathom this behavior, just remember how in 1987, Syrian special forces slaughtered a number of Hezbollah fighters in Beirut even when Syrian intelligence was coordinating with Iran. Each instance of bloodshed has a specific purpose in this business.    


The analysts who can’t absorb the Syrian-Fatah al Islam form of cooperation often cite statements made by al Qaeda in Iraq’s past commander attacking the Shiites, and hence the Alawite regime. But what escapes commentators is that theological and ideological principles can be selectively applied, so that strategic goals can be reached. The “principles” are never forgotten, but the roads to attain them can be full of blind spots. And just as a reminder, it was Ayman Zawahiri, al Qaeda’s number two who asked Zarqawi to forget about the Shiia apostates in Iraq until a more opportune time.


Thus, statements made by few hot-headed jihadi commanders in Iraq won’t stop pragmatic jihadists in Lebanon from receiving aid from Alawi apostates. There is something called al Darura that escapes many on-the-spot analysts as they navigate the highly intricate world of the jihadists: it translates into “necessity.”  If it is deemed necessary by the Emir of a group to use the goodies of an infidel party to fight the other infidel party, it will be selected comfortably. Remember how the Wahabis of the 1980s used all resources from a far-Infidel power, the United States, to fight a close infidel enemy, the Soviet Union, and learn from that example.


Seeing Beyond “Intox”


One more time, the unseen tie between the Assad regime and terrorism is in the center of international and US scrutiny. The Iraq debate in 2002-2003 fell short of reading the type of “links” that existed between the Baathist regime of Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda. Most observers missed the actual state of those relationships. From my reading of 42 pages of Iraqi intelligence (in Arabic) from the 1992-1994 years, I saw clearly how both sides were exploring the potentials. From my previous observation of Saddam’s symbolic metamorphosis in the 1990s towards a higher use of Islamist symbols, I understood that he wanted to have this dimension at his disposal without changing his regime’s doctrine deeply. It was the level of darura again. But in Assad’s case, the darura is high: The regime depends on arming jihadists (even if they could sting you later) and send them off to Iraq, and now to Lebanon.


The Salafi Jihadists are like a dangerous chemical weapon that you’d want to throw on your foe while knowing it can come back at you. But guess what? It is more important for the Assad regime to crumble the Seniora Government now and crush future Salafi backfiring later. Syrian intelligence is expert at eliminating their past tools, even if they were Syrians as well.


What the expert community in the West and in the US must do is to see beyond the analytical “intoxication” unleashed by the regimes and organizations in the region and expanded by their advocates in the West. Just keep in mind that the Iranian-Syrian axis is spending millions of dollars on one of the most sophisticated PR campaigns aiming at blurring the vision of their foes. If you investigate thoroughly the grapevines, you’d be able to find out that most of the “arguments” made in our public space about the types of relationships that “can” exist, and those that “shouldn’t,” are manufactured in Tehran and Damascus. Subconsciously or not, many in the West parrot the claims made by Middle East dictatorships, Jihadi strategists and al Jazeera commentators, unfortunately, weakening democracies’ stand in the War of Ideas.


At the end of the day, as I argue in my latest book, the ultimate strategic goal of our enemies is to force the West to see wrongly and act accordingly. In the case of Fatah al Islam’s battling in Tripoli, the aim of the Syro-Iranian propagandists is to camouflage what is obvious for as long as they can: that the Syrian regime not only has established ties to some Jihadist groups, but has in fact paved a “highway” in their direction, in the goal of using them as one of the defense lines for the regime. Hence, it is up to the public and the policy makers in the West to push through the deceptive “intoxication” tactic by Damascus and Tehran so as to see the situation clearer, and only then, act accordingly.


Click Here to support Frontpagemag.com.

Dr Walid Phares is the author of the newly released book Future Jihad. He is also a senior fellow with the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies in Washington DC.

We have implemented a new commenting system. To use it you must login/register with disqus. Registering is simple and can be done while posting this comment itself. Please contact gzenone [at] horowitzfreedomcenter.org if you have any difficulties.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Home | Blog | Horowitz | Archives | Columnists | Search | Store | Links | CSPC | Contact | Advertise with Us | Privacy Policy

Copyright©2007 FrontPageMagazine.com