Home  |   Jihad Watch  |   Horowitz  |   Archive  |   Columnists  |     DHFC  |  Store  |   Contact  |   Links  |   Search Saturday, August 02, 2014
FrontPageMag Article
Write Comment View Comments Printable Article Email Article
Font:
Amazing Grace By: Lloyd Billingsley
FrontPageMagazine.com | Tuesday, February 27, 2007


William Wilberforce (1759-1833), is not exactly a household name in America, and the cannons of political correctness would dismiss him as just another dead white male, so the somewhat clumsy exposition in the early going of Amazing Grace is justified. Viewers will learn that Wilberforce is generous, kind to animals, and not the composer of the famous title song. That honor belongs to former slave-ship captain John Newton, who in the midst of a tempest converted to Christianity. Inspired by Newton’s story, Wilberforce teams with other religious reformers, against great odds, to take down the slave trade in the British Empire.

The film spends a lot of time talking about the evils of slavery instead of showing them. That could have been easily pulled off with flashbacks from the story of John Newton, played by Albert Finney. A slave "trade" involves buyers and sellers and it would have given Amazing Grace even more nuance to show all parties of all colors, as well as the horrors slaves endured. (Newton actually kept running slaves several years after his conversion to Christianity.) But even when flattened out, the story of Wilberforce, played by Ioan Gruffudd, is a powerful one.

His father was a wealthy merchant and in his youth he fell under the influence of Newton and the Methodist movement. After a conversion of his own he falls in with the Clapham group of evangelical Anglicans. Newly inspired, he wonders whether he should pursue a more conventional religious life or tackle the evils of his time through politics. His fellow religious reformers convince him that he can do both, and he does.

More than a period piece of fine detail, Amazing Grace delivers a powerful dramatization of slavery politics. Windbags drone on in the House of Commons about how ending slavery would ruin the country and empire will collapse, how the French would simply take it over and prosper, and so on. The pro-slavers also smear the reformers as pro-French and pro-American subversives. After some defeats, the reformers turn the tables with a clever measure that turns out both anti-French and anti-slavery.

Wilberforce and his ally William Pitt, the Prime Minister, are both fighting health problems but keep pressing the case, collecting evidence and gathering signatures. Their bill to end the slave trade eventually carries the day. Music up with a swell. The good guys win, but there is more to the story. Wilberforce, now a family man, continued reforms on other fronts. A month after his death, Parliament gave freedom to all slaves in the British Empire.

Amazing Grace confirms Orwell's observation that there is no such thing as staying out of politics. The film is a cinematic refutation of politically correct dogmas that the past is nothing more than a chronicle of oppression and that class and race determine politics. Here too is evidence that faith and goodness are dramatically viable, a welcome departure from past caricatures of evangelicals, a favorite target of the left. Turns out, they do a lot more that sit around and sing hymns and the world is now a better place for it.

Human beings who have God-given rights cannot be rightly enslaved. That's what drove the heroes of Amazing Grace. The language of human rights came from Western civilization, based on Judeo-Christian values. Victory over slavery came from societies, especially Britain and the United States, whose commitment to human rights deepened precisely because they fought against their own involvement with “the peculiar institution.” It is no accident that slavery still exists in countries dominated by a different tradition. A movie with the verisimilitude of Amazing Grace remains to be made about that.

Click Here to support Frontpagemag.com.


Lloyd Billingsley is the author of From Mainline to Sideline, the Social Witness of the National Council of Churches, and Hollywood Party: How Communism Seduced the American Film Industry in the 1930s and 1940s.


We have implemented a new commenting system. To use it you must login/register with disqus. Registering is simple and can be done while posting this comment itself. Please contact gzenone [at] horowitzfreedomcenter.org if you have any difficulties.
blog comments powered by Disqus




Home | Blog | Horowitz | Archives | Columnists | Search | Store | Links | CSPC | Contact | Advertise with Us | Privacy Policy

Copyright©2007 FrontPageMagazine.com