Home  |   Jihad Watch  |   Horowitz  |   Archive  |   Columnists  |     DHFC  |  Store  |   Contact  |   Links  |   Search Thursday, April 24, 2014
FrontPageMag Article
Write Comment View Comments Printable Article Email Article
Font:
Victory in Pennsylvania By: Sara Dogan
StudentsForAcademicFreedom.org | Friday, December 08, 2006


Dear Students and Supporters,

Students for Academic Freedom has just achieved a remarkable victory in the state of Pennsylvania. For the first time in Pennsylvania history and probably in U.S. history, students have academic freedom rights at two major universities, Temple University and Pennsylvania State University. What’s more, a select committee of the Pennsylvania Legislature charged with evaluating current academic freedom protections on Pennsylvania’s public university campuses concluded that students’ academic freedom rights are not protected and significant reforms are necessary. The following op-ed written by our chairman David Horowitz describes in detail the process that led to these momentous reforms and the duplicitous campaign launched by the teacher’s unions in an attempt to disguise their significance.

We are already taking action to replicate the model which led to these historic policy changes in other states. But the momentum to achieve this result lies with you, our student leaders and supporters.

Protecting Academic Freedom Rights on Your Campus

The recent legislative report issued by Pennsylvania’s select committee on academic freedom and the new policies adopted by Temple and Penn State in response to the committee’s recommendations offer a tremendous opportunity to push for student-specific policies protecting academic freedom rights at campus all across the nation. The existing policies on Pennsylvania’s campuses which the legislative committee just ruled insufficient are by-and-large the same policies which exist at nearly every college and university in America: they protect the academic freedom of faculty but not of students, and do not provide an appropriate grievance procedure whereby students can challenge violations of their academic freedom. 

We urge our SAF chapter leaders to use these recent victories in Pennsylvania as a benchmark for what can be achieved in your own states and schools. Examine your school’s academic freedom policies to see whether they specifically protect students’ academic freedom (in virtually all cases, they will not). Survey your fellow students about their experiences in the classroom to collect evidence that students’ academic freedom is being violated. Complaint forms specifying common types of abuses are available on our website here.

Once you have amassed a body of evidence showing that students’ academic freedom is in jeopardy, request a meeting with your college president or dean of students and ask them to adopt a policy specifically protecting students’ academic freedom such as the Temple Bill of Rights or the new policy at Penn State.

How to Get Involved

If you’re not already active in Students for Academic Freedom, please contact me at Sara@studentsforacademicfreedom.org or at 888-527-3321. You can also find more information on our website at http://www.studentsforacademicfreedom.org/. We can help you to start a chapter of Students for Academic Freedom and bring the academic freedom movement to your campus today.       

Yours in Freedom,

Sara Dogan
National Campus Director
Students for Academic Freedom

A Remarkable Achievement for Academic Freedom in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

By David Horowitz

Now that the dust has settled on the academic freedom hearings that were held in Pennsylvania from September 2005 to June 2006, it is time to look at what was actually accomplished. According to the teacher unions, and their allies in the press, the effort was a “waste of time.” This was the editorial comment in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette for example. Others found the results modest, if worthy. The Associated Press began its report by noting that the legislative Committee on Academic Freedom had urged Pennsylvania universities “to review and make students aware of academic freedom policies.” This was a corrective to the existing state of affairs in which students were generally unaware that such policies exist. If you don’t know your rights, you might as well not have them.

But this was only the tip of the iceberg of what the hearings in Pennsylvania actually accomplished.  The hearings were held over nine months at four locations – Harrisburg, Pittsburgh, Millersville and Philadelphia. What they revealed was startling. Fact: all of Pennsylvania’s academic freedom provisions were written to protect professors; students in Pennsylvania did not have any academic freedom rights. Not a single public university in the Commonwealth had academic freedom provisions that applied to students.  

Administrators from five Pennsylvania universities appeared before the committee and claimed that students were already protected by the academic freedom regulations on their books. But when the regulations were actually examined by the Committee, it was evident that they applied only to professors. In other words, students not only did not know their rights, they didn’t have any. The Committee has recommended that this deficiency be corrected, and Pennsylvania universities have already stepped forward to do so.

As soon as the hearings were concluded in June, the trustees of Temple – one of the three large public universities in the state -- undertook the writing of a new policy called “Faculty and Student Rights and Responsibilities.” The policy went into effect on August 1, 2006. For the first time in Pennsylvania history, Pennsylvania students have been provided with academic freedom rights. These rights are accompanied by a new grievance machinery specific to academic freedom matters, along with a system that reports abuses directly to the board of trustees.  

Shortly after the new Temple policy was announced, the faculty senate at Penn State passed its own new Policy 20-00 which states, “Students having concerns about situations that arise within the classroom, or concerns with instructor behavior in a course that violates University standards of classroom conduct as defined in Policy HR64 ‘Academic Freedom,’ may seek resolution according to the recommended procedures established under Policy 20-00, Resolution of Classroom Problems.” As at Temple, Penn State’s academic freedom policy previously applied only to professors.

Penn State Policy HR 64 is one of the most powerful statements of the meaning of academic freedom on the books. It states: “The faculty member is entitled to freedom in the classroom in discussing his/her subject. The faculty member is, however, responsible for the maintenance of appropriate standards of scholarship and teaching ability. It is not the function of a faculty member in a democracy to indoctrinate his/her students with ready-made conclusions on controversial subjects. The faculty member is expected to train students to think for themselves, and to provide them access to those materials which they need if they are to think intelligently. Hence in giving instruction upon controversial matters the faculty member is expected to be of a fair and judicial mind, and to set forth justly, without supersession or innuendo, the divergent opinions of other investigators.” (emphasis added)

This would be powerful enough, but the policy also states: “No faculty member may claim as a right the privilege of discussing in the classroom controversial topics outside his/her own field of study. The faculty member is normally bound not to take advantage of his/her position by introducing into the classroom provocative discussions of irrelevant subjects not within the field of his/her study.”

In other words: No speeches on the Iraq War in English classes where the course matter is not about Iraq or American foreign policy. No in-class attempts to promote a political candidate during elections. No personal agendas that have nothing to do with the academic subject the students have signed up for.

The adoption of these new policies is a watershed event in the history of education not only in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, but nationally as well. Pennsylvania is the first state in the nation where universities have instituted academic freedom policies that protect students as well as professors. May the rest of Pennsylvania’s universities follow the examples of Temple and Penn State, and may the nation’s universities do so as well.

Click Here to support Frontpagemag.com.


Sara Dogan is National Campus Director of Students for Academic Freedom.


We have implemented a new commenting system. To use it you must login/register with disqus. Registering is simple and can be done while posting this comment itself. Please contact gzenone [at] horowitzfreedomcenter.org if you have any difficulties.
blog comments powered by Disqus




Home | Blog | Horowitz | Archives | Columnists | Search | Store | Links | CSPC | Contact | Advertise with Us | Privacy Policy

Copyright©2007 FrontPageMagazine.com