Home  |   Jihad Watch  |   Horowitz  |   Archive  |   Columnists  |     DHFC  |  Store  |   Contact  |   Links  |   Search Friday, October 24, 2014
FrontPageMag Article
Write Comment View Comments Printable Article Email Article
Font:
Leftists Have Sided With Radical Islam By: Robert Fulford
The National Post | Tuesday, November 30, 2004


 Get your copy of David Horowitz's new book, Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left, for only $18 from the FrontPage Magazine Bookstore.

The American left of the 21st century  has reached the point where it defines itself by what it loathes.  Leftists who once dreamt  of a better world  now spend their passion on their antipathies  and seldom even mention social progress. The Democratic party's left wing no longer  has any purpose  except keeping conservatives out of power,  so far a strikingly unsuccessful project.

Even so,  the U.S. left remains influential. Between elections it may look like no more than a shaky alliance of Marxist professors,  guilt-ridden millionaires,  the Ford Foundation and Barbra Streisand; but David Horowitz,  an articulate right-wing propagandist,  declines to take it lightly.  He knows that since the 1960s  left-wing ideas have helped shape the American imagination. Leftist assumptions  become mainstream assumptions.

Horowitz's new book,  Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left  (Regnery),  describes the latest blind alley  down which the left has stampeded.  Put plainly,  American leftists responded to 9/11  by going over to the side of the enemy,  radical Islam. They are captives of what Horowitz calls "neo-communism," a combination of romantic yearning for the Soviet empire and unreasoning hatred of capitalism and U.S. power. In practice,  this means they sympathize  with any force Washington opposes.

After 9/11,  when the Americans began fighting the Taliban,  leftist demonstrators declared the war in Afghanistan "racist." As Horowitz says,

"Within weeks of the most heinous attack on America in its history,  radicals had turned their own country into villains."

He describes the bewilderment of Paul Berman,  a New York writer who has spent decades searching for a humane leftist politics. Berman was attending the 2002 Socialist Scholars Conference in New York when the crowd applauded an Egyptian novelist's defence of a Palestinian suicide murderer.
How could that happen? How could secular socialists sit "in comradely assemblage," as Berman wrote,  while someone defended the random murder of women and children in the name of God? Horowitz explains that radicals believe Western capitalism actually causes Islamic fanaticism. If capitalism wasn't so evil,  the reasoning goes,  then Arabs wouldn't turn to Islamism. Therefore,  "The liberation of the world from private property ... will liberate Islamic fanatics from the need to be Islamic and fanatic."

In Hollywood the fight against terrorism has attracted only meagre support. Even when Theo Van Gogh,  a Dutch filmmaker,  was assassinated for making a documentary in defence of Islamic women,  Hollywood showed little interest. As Bridget Johnson pointed out on Wednesday in The Wall Street Journal,  "We've heard nary a peep from Hollywood about the Van Gogh slaying." Johnson quoted a screenwriter,  Roger L. Simon:

"It's stunning how silent the American artistic community,  Hollywood in particular,  has been about the murder. Do they care someone was killed for making a film which protested violent abuse against women? Are they even interested?"

Horowitz can explain that Hollywood's political posture derives from a tradition created by communists  and renewed by the New Left.

Hollywood leftists remain mute because they desperately fear being associated,  even in a distant way,  with a cause that Washington has adopted. They hate George W. Bush much more than they fear the Islamists.

Unholy Alliance is directed at conservatives  and those of independent mind who are open to persuasion.  Horowitz can hardly expect a fair-minded reading by leftists,  who consider him an apostate  who turned in fury against his original beliefs. The son of two communists who lost their teaching jobs  during the McCarthy period,  he was a New Left journalist in the 1960s  and a passionate supporter of the Black Panthers.

His close scrutiny of the Panthers,  and the way leftists and the mainstream media treated them,  eventually made him question every political opinion he owned.
 
He came to believe the Panthers were a murderous street gang  who hid their thuggishness behind Marxist rhetoric.  Many of his leftist friends,  while knowing about the crimes of the Panthers,  chose to ignore them,  just as communists of two decades before had overlooked  the crimes of Stalin. And the mainstream media,  having bought the leftist propaganda  about the Panthers as heroes,  refused to confront facts that would disturb the mythology.

Horowitz was the exception. That experience turned him  into a right-wing pamphleteer  - a supporter of free enterprise,  an enemy of America's enemies  and an unrelenting critic of his old friends on the left. He's an interesting commentator who writes with an angry but controlled animation. And he's one journalist who can say with a reasonable claim to truth that he hasn't been seriously wrong since the 1960s.
 



We have implemented a new commenting system. To use it you must login/register with disqus. Registering is simple and can be done while posting this comment itself. Please contact gzenone [at] horowitzfreedomcenter.org if you have any difficulties.
blog comments powered by Disqus




Home | Blog | Horowitz | Archives | Columnists | Search | Store | Links | CSPC | Contact | Advertise with Us | Privacy Policy

Copyright©2007 FrontPageMagazine.com